Guidance in Program-Level Accreditation
نویسنده
چکیده
The National Commission for Assessment, Assurance and Accreditation (NCAAA) is the Quality Assessment arm of the Saudi Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE). In this paper we describe a locally-developed Webbased Outcome-Directed "Program-Level" accreditation system that complies and provides guidance with the NCAAA program accreditation requirements. It has dual purpose: first to automate the process of preparing all relevant accreditation documents, measurements, benchmarks, surveys, tests, statistics, forms, etc. And establish meaningful hyperlinks and structure among all relevant material. It also provides tools for performing important assessments functions such as PLO/CLO mapping, Rubrics direct assessment, surveys indirect assessment, trend analysis, etc. By running this E-Accreditation system one can have access to “electronic” showroom that contains all needed forms and evidence materials. This automated system helps to "stream line" the whole accreditation process. It prevents current document and data inflation. It also slims down the process and provides an agile management system. The second and novel purpose of the proposed system is to work in "reverse" for guidance and advice such as to equip students with learning outcomes instead of just measuring their degree of compliance. In fact the accreditation system is a sort of a "Live" repository that follows the continuous improvement slogan. In the sense that every semester new added documents, measurements, benchmarks, surveys, tests, statistics, forms, trend analysis, etc. are tallied to the system. At PSU this compliance, tracking and guidance system has been lunched as a full-fledged spin-off product. It is intended to be used by both internal and external programs within KSA. Both the Information Systems and Computer Science programs at Prince Sultan University (have recently been fully accredited for 7 years by the NCAAA) have used an earlier release of the proposed system. Demonstrating NCAAA compliance and guidance system is exemplified by the case of the "Information Systems" department at Prince Sultan University as a case study. In this context we describe how "Learning Outcomes" are measured and injected (guided) at both the program and course levels. We dig deep to the course level and describe measurements, assessments, and guidance tools at th eir levels. We finally show how the system is used to track and strengthen weak areas and direct users' focus to these areas. In many cases the system recommends remedies for improvement. Keywords-Compliance, Guidance, Assessment, Measurements, Accreditation
منابع مشابه
Perceived Stress and Anxiety of Healthcare Providers Before and After a Hospital Accreditation Program in Ahvaz
Background: Evaluation and accreditation of hospitals have essential roles in improving the quality, safety, and effectiveness of healthcare services. Nevertheless, this process may cause stress and anxiety among hospital staff. This study aims to determine and compare the level of anxiety and perceived stress of employees before and after the accreditation program in Ahvaz private hospitals. ...
متن کاملIran hospital accreditation governance: Challenges and solutions
Background and Aim: Hospital accreditation is “an external evaluation of a hospital’s structures, processes, outputs and outcomes by an independent professional accreditation body using pre-established optimum standards”. Accreditation is a strategy for ensuring the quality and, safety of hospital services. An accreditation program’s efficacy depends on the validity of its governance, methods, ...
متن کاملDevelopment and effectiveness of a comprehensive program for evaluating the performance of the educational system on the result of evaluation and educational accreditation of Shahid Beheshti hospital in Babol
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In order to evaluate the performance of teaching hospitals, the patterns of accreditation system as one of the most important packages of transformation and innovation plan in medical education, considered by the Ministry of Health. One of the serious challenges of the educational accreditation program is the use of a same standard set to evaluate the educatio...
متن کاملInterrelating sentinel event alert #38 with the ACR guidance document on MR safe practices: 2013. An MRI accreditation safety review tool.
When, in 2008, the Joint Commission released its Sentinel Event Alert #38 regarding MRI safety, it joined the ACR's Guidance Document on MR Safe Practices as one of two radiology best-practice documents establishing MR safety protections. However, particularly for MR providers who held both modality-level accreditation from the ACR, and enterprise-level accreditation from the Joint Commission, ...
متن کاملThe Journey to ACGME Accreditation: A Program's Perspectives and Practical Guidance From the ACGME.
In 2014, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), American Osteopathic Association (AOA), and American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine approved a single accreditation system for graduate medical education in the United States. For osteopathic graduate medical education programs transitioning to ACGME accreditation, this change has been met with a mixture...
متن کامل